Grey Catbirds are common birds around here that were a bit of a challenge to photograph because they spend much of their time hanging out in dense, brushy areas. Since learning this it seems appropriate that my first good photo of one was this:
This is a crop of the first picture of a catbird I took that I liked.This is the full photo. Almost the entire picture is out of focus foreground plants… I had to line the bird up with a small gap in the leaves to get the picture.
Though I may not see the catbirds themselves too frequently, I know they’re common because I hear them all the time and almost everywhere. (They’re very talkative birds.) If I follow the sound I can often spot where it is coming from but not necessarily get a clear look at the bird.
Catbirds can make a wide range of different sounds as well. They have some sounds that are specific to them and will also mimic other birds (like this one was doing, stringing a bunch of different birdsongs together in rapid succession).This is a more recent picture of a catbird calling. It is probably my favorite now.
Here is a photo I took of a young grape leaf. I think what had originally attracted me to photographing this particular leaf was the sun shining through it, highlighting the leaf veins. But in the end, I actually preferred this shot from the front, instead of the ones with the light coming through the leaf. There are lots of interesting little details in this photo, like the tiny hairs on the midrib (and some of the more major leaf veins) and the veins that form an almost perfect pentagon… which is why I decided to include this close up cropped version as well.
I was out with my camera one day and I spotted this little jumping spider with an impressively large catch (a green bottle fly, I think). Jumping spiders are active little hunters; they do not build webs and wait for prey to get trapped, they search out and pounce on their prey. In this case, by the time I spotted them both the fly and the spider were suspended in midair by a strand of the spider’s silk (which they use as a safety line when they leap off of things) and spinning wildly. I’m not sure if the spider managed to pounce on the fly in midair or if the fly took off right after being pounced on.
This was the first picture in the series, when the spider and fly were still spinning. I was using a relatively fast shutter speed, but you can still see the motion blur from the spinning. I think it makes for an interesting action shot, though.After subduing the fly, the spider reeled it up the silk thread.
I went up north recently to visit my Grandma and while I was walking around her yard I kept noticing lichens everywhere. They were small and probably not very noticeable to most, but they really stuck out to me because they were still much larger then the vast majority of the lichens that grow where I live. (And of the few that are larger, I haven’t seen any that are as brightly colored or intricately textured like the ones I was finding at my Grandma’s. This isn’t to say there aren’t any interesting lichens where I live, but they’re just generally much smaller and harder to find.) Lichens are pretty amazing, but I don’t know a whole lot about them, really. Most of what I do know is from reading the book Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer (which I highly recommend), which was enough to pique my interest. So, for this post I don’t have much to say about the individual photos, I just think they look cool.
“They blur the definition of what it means to be an individual, as a lichen is not one being, but two: a fungus and an alga. These partners are as different as could be and yet are joined in a symbiosis so close that their union becomes a wholly new organism.” (From the chapter about lichens in Braiding Sweetgrass.)
If you enjoy my posts, please share with a friend!
My new telephoto lens is probably now my most high tech piece of camera equipment, and I’ve been pretty impressed with its capabilities. As I’ve been teaching myself to use it, I’ve been getting an idea of what kinds of things it can do.
Goldfinch foraging on sunchoke seeds. This photo was a surprise because I took it through a window screen! I can see some loss of quality in the photo as a result, but it isn’t nearly as bad as I would have expected, and I would have startled the birds away if I’d gone outside (they were pretty close to the door) so I was happy to get anything at all in that situation.
I mentioned in my last post that I can use my telephoto lens like a pair of binoculars, but the lens actually has an edge over binoculars because it has some built in stabilization that cancels out the tiny movements you make when holding something, which get very magnified when looking at a zoomed in image of something far away. This means the image I see looking through the viewfinder is much steadier than what I see looking through binoculars. (And then being able to take a photo of whatever I’m looking at is also nice, of course!)
For birds with subtle markings or features or birds hanging out in hard to see places, like this house finch in a cedar tree, looking through the telephoto lens helps to be able to identify the birds, and is helping me get a better idea of what birds we have around here.
When it comes to taking the actual picture, the stabilization helps some in preventing the photo from being blurry from slight movements (when you aren’t using a tripod, which isn’t very practical in a lot of situations), but the usual way to do this is with a very fast shutter speed. The person at the camera shop where I got the lens told me I’d be able to use a bit slower shutter speed than I would otherwise, but I would still need it faster than I was used to to get a sharp photo. Despite this advice, it was probably inevitable that I would try pushing the limits with lower speeds eventually (because faster speeds limit the light available and you end up with a darker picture or you have to find a way to make up for it elsewhere), and surprisingly, I was finding I could hold the camera steady enough to use pretty low speeds without getting a blurry photo, which is great… until a subject starts moving around quickly.
This was where I got a little too confident with slow shutter speeds… I can’t say for sure this picture would have turned out well if I’d used a faster speed, but this woodpecker was foraging pretty energetically on the dogwood berries and definitely moving around too fast for the speed I was on.The moon, at least, is a good safe subject to use a slow shutter speed on, which is helpful with a dark scene like this.
Lately it seems like I’m very much starting to get the hang of getting good bird photos (I’ll probably save those for their own posts, though), but even the less than perfect shots have been helping me to identify quite a lot of birds I wasn’t able to see clearly enough before; I mostly just managed to identify the bigger/brighter/more distinctive looking species.
This photo of a swamp sparrow almost turned out perfectly – except that there was something out of focus creating a bit of a haze over the bird. Otherwise, it is perfectly in focus, the sparrow is in a nice position and the background is good… but at least this photo provides a nice view of most of the bird’s markings so I could identify it as a swamp sparrow! Sparrows can be a bit tricky with their subtle markings and usually mostly brown colors… but like a lot of my subjects, they benefit from a closer look.
Relatively recently, I got a new type of lens for my camera. Previously, I had a macro lens and a pretty standard non-specialized type of lens. The new one is a telephoto lens, which is a type of lens that allows you to zoom in on distant subjects.
A very relaxed rabbit.
A telephoto lens has very different uses and possibilities compared with a macro lens, but there is one thing about it that feels familiar; both lenses allow me to photograph things I can’t quite make out. I may be able to see them, but not clearly enough to tell what I’m looking at. Through the lens, I can see them with much more detail. (Sometimes I will just look through the lens like binoculars to see what that dark shape in the trees is.) So, what the macro lens does for tiny objects (or creatures), the telephoto lens does for distant objects (or creatures).
A male goldfinch perched on a spruce branch. This was taken shortly after I got the new lens.
So this new lens doesn’t make any of my previous lenses obsolete, it just opens up a whole bunch of new possibilities that weren’t there before. One of the main things I’d had in mind for it when I got it was to use it to photograph birds; a telephoto lens is pretty much a requirement for bird photography. The lens also works well for butterflies and presumably any other large, skittish insects, like dragonflies.
A monarch butterfly foraging on New England aster flowers. It is possible to get a photo like this without a telephoto lens, but it would be a lot harder and more dependent on luck. (Most of my previous butterfly photos happened when a butterfly approached while I was photographing other pollinators.)
Another use for it I’ve found that’s less apparent is to be able to get a different angle on certain subjects, even though I can get close to them and I want a ‘close up’ of them…
This is a relatively close up picture of these sunchokes, but I took it from a ways away so that I could line the bright yellow flowers up with the dark backdrop of a clump of trees to the south, making for some sharp contrast. I had seen this contrast in previous years, but I wasn’t able to photograph it with the lenses I had at that point. Once I got the telephoto lens, I knew exactly what to do with it.
There are a couple of fairly common woodland butterflies that I usually start to see right around this time of year: the comma butterfly and the mourning cloak butterfly. It should be a bit of a toss-up which I see first since they start to appear at roughly the same time. In practice, it seems like I usually spot the mourning cloak first. This year was no exception to that; I spotted my first mourning cloak on the 21st (I didn’t have my camera with me at the time, though), and I haven’t spotted a comma yet.
The two species are relatively closely related and have a similar strategy that allows them to be present super early in the spring; both overwinter as adults and can feed on tree sap so they aren’t dependent on flowers blooming to be active.
This mourning cloak butterfly was basking in a patch of sunshine in the woods which might be part of why I was able to creep up on it. Their distinctive colors and markings make them pretty unmistakable.This comma butterfly is perched on one of its host plants (plants their caterpillars develop on), willow.
We have some pretty cool looking trees in the woods here, but it can be kind of tricky to get photos of them that really show off their unique character. Getting just the right angle on these massive oaks is a challenge, especially in the woods where you have limited options because there are so many other trees around. This tree is amazing looking and I’ve taken pictures of it before, but this is the first time I’ve been satisfied with the results.
Lately I’ve been trying to get some more recent creek reflection photos because they’re always fun to look at, and most of my better ones were from my old camera. Basically I was trying to recreate the effect with higher quality photos… which is not exactly how these turned out, but I think they turned out pretty well anyway.
It occurred to me that in one of my last posts ‘Life in a Dead Tree’, I described the bees I found nesting in the tree, and included the best photo I’d managed to take of one of them, which wasn’t very good. I knew at the time that it wasn’t particularly good, but decided it was better than nothing. That didn’t stop me from trying to get a better one next time their nesting season came around. It took me over a month of attempting whenever the weather seemed good for bees to be active, but I finally managed to get the photos I was after. And some of my ‘failed’ attempts were actually kind of cool in their own right.
At the time I took this picture, I wasn’t sure whether to be amused or disappointed that only the bee’s antennae were visible… I did not have a proper picture of these bees nesting yet, and the bee seemed to have no intention of coming out the rest of the way. It is kind of cute though, and now I can properly enjoy it knowing I eventually succeeded in photographing these bees.This is the nest of the bee I waited for for quite a while (in a not very comfortable position) to come out of her nest. All she ever did was poke her antennae out a bit. I spotted this nest thanks to all the ‘sawdust’ piled around the entrance from recent excavations. All you can really see of the bee in this photo is a tiny glint of green in the hole.This is not the species of bee I was after, but it was my first decent photo of a bee emerging from a nest in a log. It isn’t quite as sharp as my next set of pictures, but it does show the bee actively excavating her nest (you can see the chewed up wood in her mandibles) which I think is pretty cool.My first clear shot of an augochlora bee exiting her nest!Another shot of the augochlora bee taken a second or so after the first. I spotted this bee as she was entering her nest, and had to wait a while for her to come back out. Fortunately, I was able to get into a better position this time.Another bee scoping out a log. I don’t know if she had a nest here, or if she was looking for a spot to build her nest, but she looked pretty next to the yellow-green moss. Her genus name, augochlora, actually translates to ‘gold-green’.
