This spring while out in the woods I noticed a blue jay watching me from a branch nearby. The jay’s idle curiosity gave me a generous opportunity to get some photos (I think I even had to switch lenses). I wouldn’t be surprised if this particular bird recognized me as a regular visitor to the woods.
I like being able to figure out interesting ways to photograph familiar subjects that shows them in a much different way than people are used to seeing them (usually in a way that draws attention to something I’ve noticed about them). These photos are a good example of that concept: 
If you weren’t able to figure it out, these are veins on the ‘wings’ of maple seeds (which are technically called samaras). The samara in the second to last photo is the oldest; the green between the veins is actually the background because that one was pretty translucent. These were all cropped at least slightly which gives them a nice abstract look, but I also liked some of them uncropped too.
Grey Catbirds are common birds around here that were a bit of a challenge to photograph because they spend much of their time hanging out in dense, brushy areas. Since learning this it seems appropriate that my first good photo of one was this:
Though I may not see the catbirds themselves too frequently, I know they’re common because I hear them all the time and almost everywhere. (They’re very talkative birds.) If I follow the sound I can often spot where it is coming from but not necessarily get a clear look at the bird.
Here is a photo I took of a young grape leaf. I think what had originally attracted me to photographing this particular leaf was the sun shining through it, highlighting the leaf veins. But in the end, I actually preferred this shot from the front, instead of the ones with the light coming through the leaf. There are lots of interesting little details in this photo, like the tiny hairs on the midrib (and some of the more major leaf veins) and the veins that form an almost perfect pentagon… which is why I decided to include this close up cropped version as well.
I was out with my camera one day and I spotted this little jumping spider with an impressively large catch (a green bottle fly, I think). Jumping spiders are active little hunters; they do not build webs and wait for prey to get trapped, they search out and pounce on their prey. In this case, by the time I spotted them both the fly and the spider were suspended in midair by a strand of the spider’s silk (which they use as a safety line when they leap off of things) and spinning wildly. I’m not sure if the spider managed to pounce on the fly in midair or if the fly took off right after being pounced on.
I went up north recently to visit my Grandma and while I was walking around her yard I kept noticing lichens everywhere. They were small and probably not very noticeable to most, but they really stuck out to me because they were still much larger then the vast majority of the lichens that grow where I live. (And of the few that are larger, I haven’t seen any that are as brightly colored or intricately textured like the ones I was finding at my Grandma’s. This isn’t to say there aren’t any interesting lichens where I live, but they’re just generally much smaller and harder to find.) Lichens are pretty amazing, but I don’t know a whole lot about them, really. Most of what I do know is from reading the book Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer (which I highly recommend), which was enough to pique my interest. So, for this post I don’t have much to say about the individual photos, I just think they look cool.
“They blur the definition of what it means to be an individual, as a lichen is not one being, but two: a fungus and an alga. These partners are as different as could be and yet are joined in a symbiosis so close that their union becomes a wholly new organism.” (From the chapter about lichens in Braiding Sweetgrass.)
If you enjoy my posts, please share with a friend!
My new telephoto lens is probably now my most high tech piece of camera equipment, and I’ve been pretty impressed with its capabilities. As I’ve been teaching myself to use it, I’ve been getting an idea of what kinds of things it can do.
I mentioned in my last post that I can use my telephoto lens like a pair of binoculars, but the lens actually has an edge over binoculars because it has some built in stabilization that cancels out the tiny movements you make when holding something, which get very magnified when looking at a zoomed in image of something far away. This means the image I see looking through the viewfinder is much steadier than what I see looking through binoculars. (And then being able to take a photo of whatever I’m looking at is also nice, of course!)
When it comes to taking the actual picture, the stabilization helps some in preventing the photo from being blurry from slight movements (when you aren’t using a tripod, which isn’t very practical in a lot of situations), but the usual way to do this is with a very fast shutter speed. The person at the camera shop where I got the lens told me I’d be able to use a bit slower shutter speed than I would otherwise, but I would still need it faster than I was used to to get a sharp photo. Despite this advice, it was probably inevitable that I would try pushing the limits with lower speeds eventually (because faster speeds limit the light available and you end up with a darker picture or you have to find a way to make up for it elsewhere), and surprisingly, I was finding I could hold the camera steady enough to use pretty low speeds without getting a blurry photo, which is great… until a subject starts moving around quickly.
Lately it seems like I’m very much starting to get the hang of getting good bird photos (I’ll probably save those for their own posts, though), but even the less than perfect shots have been helping me to identify quite a lot of birds I wasn’t able to see clearly enough before; I mostly just managed to identify the bigger/brighter/more distinctive looking species.
Relatively recently, I got a new type of lens for my camera. Previously, I had a macro lens and a pretty standard non-specialized type of lens. The new one is a telephoto lens, which is a type of lens that allows you to zoom in on distant subjects.
A telephoto lens has very different uses and possibilities compared with a macro lens, but there is one thing about it that feels familiar; both lenses allow me to photograph things I can’t quite make out. I may be able to see them, but not clearly enough to tell what I’m looking at. Through the lens, I can see them with much more detail. (Sometimes I will just look through the lens like binoculars to see what that dark shape in the trees is.) So, what the macro lens does for tiny objects (or creatures), the telephoto lens does for distant objects (or creatures).
So this new lens doesn’t make any of my previous lenses obsolete, it just opens up a whole bunch of new possibilities that weren’t there before. One of the main things I’d had in mind for it when I got it was to use it to photograph birds; a telephoto lens is pretty much a requirement for bird photography. The lens also works well for butterflies and presumably any other large, skittish insects, like dragonflies.
Another use for it I’ve found that’s less apparent is to be able to get a different angle on certain subjects, even though I can get close to them and I want a ‘close up’ of them…
There are a couple of fairly common woodland butterflies that I usually start to see right around this time of year: the comma butterfly and the mourning cloak butterfly. It should be a bit of a toss-up which I see first since they start to appear at roughly the same time. In practice, it seems like I usually spot the mourning cloak first. This year was no exception to that; I spotted my first mourning cloak on the 21st (I didn’t have my camera with me at the time, though), and I haven’t spotted a comma yet.
The two species are relatively closely related and have a similar strategy that allows them to be present super early in the spring; both overwinter as adults and can feed on tree sap so they aren’t dependent on flowers blooming to be active.
We have some pretty cool looking trees in the woods here, but it can be kind of tricky to get photos of them that really show off their unique character. Getting just the right angle on these massive oaks is a challenge, especially in the woods where you have limited options because there are so many other trees around. This tree is amazing looking and I’ve taken pictures of it before, but this is the first time I’ve been satisfied with the results.
